Reconstruction of system definitional and state information

ABSTRACT

A determination is made as to whether one of a system definition file data set and a catalog data set is unavailable for orderly restart of an information system. The system definition file data set provides resource definition information for the information system and the catalog data set provides resource state information for the information system. A determination is made that the other of the system definition file data set and the catalog data set is available. The unavailable one of the system definition file data set and the catalog data set is reconstructed by rebuilding the system resource definition and state information used by the unavailable one of the system definition file data set and the catalog data set using system resource information within the other available one of the system definition file data set and the catalog data set.

BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to information systems. More particularly,the present invention relates to reconstruction of system definitionaland state information.

Information systems, such as online information control systems, mayutilize resource definitions that initially define configurations ofsystem resources. These systems may also generate resource statedata/information during system operation.

BRIEF SUMMARY

A method includes determining, via a processor, that one of a systemdefinition file data set and a catalog data set is unavailable fororderly restart of an information system, where the system definitionfile data set provides resource definition information and the catalogdata set provides resource state information for the information system;determining that the other of the system definition file data set andthe catalog data set is available; and reconstructing the unavailableone of the system definition file data set and the catalog data set byrebuilding the system resource definition and state information used bythe unavailable one of the system definition file data set and thecatalog data set using system resource information within the otheravailable one of the system definition file data set and the catalogdata set.

A system includes a memory and a processor programmed to: determine thatone of a system definition file data set and a catalog data set isunavailable for orderly restart of an information system, where thesystem definition file data set provides resource definition informationand the catalog data set provides resource state information for theinformation system; determine that the other of the system definitionfile data set and the catalog data set is available; and reconstructwithin the memory the unavailable one of the system definition file dataset and the catalog data set by rebuilding the system resourcedefinition and state information used by the unavailable one of thesystem definition file data set and the catalog data set using systemresource information within the other available one of the systemdefinition file data set and the catalog data set.

A computer program product includes a computer readable storage mediumhaving computer readable program code embodied therewith, where thecomputer readable program code when executed on a computer causes thecomputer to determine that one of a system definition file data set anda catalog data set is unavailable for orderly restart of an informationsystem, where the system definition file data set provides resourcedefinition information and the catalog data set provides resource stateinformation for the information system; determine that the other of thesystem definition file data set and the catalog data set is available;and reconstruct the unavailable one of the system definition file dataset and the catalog data set by rebuilding the system resourcedefinition and state information used by the unavailable one of thesystem definition file data set and the catalog data set using systemresource information within the other available one of the systemdefinition file data set and the catalog data set.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example of an implementation of a systemfor reconstruction of system definitional and state informationaccording to an embodiment of the present subject matter;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example of an implementation of a coreprocessing module capable of performing reconstruction of systemdefinitional and state information according to an embodiment of thepresent subject matter;

FIG. 3 is a flow chart of an example of an implementation of a processfor reconstruction of system definitional and state informationaccording to an embodiment of the present subject matter;

FIG. 4A is a flow chart of an example of an implementation of initialprocessing within a process for automated reconstruction of systemdefinitional and state information according to an embodiment of thepresent subject matter; and

FIG. 4B is a flow chart of an example of an implementation of additionalprocessing within a process for automated reconstruction of systemdefinitional and state information according to an embodiment of thepresent subject matter.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The examples set forth below represent the necessary information toenable those skilled in the art to practice the invention and illustratethe best mode of practicing the invention. Upon reading the followingdescription in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilledin the art will understand the concepts of the invention and willrecognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressedherein. It should be understood that these concepts and applicationsfall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.

The subject matter described herein provides reconstruction of systemdefinitional and state information. The present technology providesautomated recovery (or partial recovery) of a system data set, such as asystem data set known in a customer information control system (CICS®)as the CICS® System Definition file (CSD), from information available ona catalog data set that includes last-updated state information forinstalled resources. As such, in the event of the loss of an originalCSD, which would otherwise prevent any form of system restart, a warmrestart of a system may be performed with a CSD that has a match withrespect to resources that were cataloged at the end of the previous run.Similarly, a catalog data set may be generated that matches the settingsof the CSD, and allow the system to start up with a view of the resourcestate that matched the resource state from the initialized settings ofthe resource data set. Accordingly, based upon the technology describedherein, an information system customer/user may avoid the problem of alost data set (e.g., either a CSD or catalog data set) by at least beingable to warm restart their systems, and thereby plan a managed shut downand subsequent cold restart once the nature and extent of any systemresource exposure as a result of the data set losses is determined.Additionally, diagnostic notifications may be generated that documentsfor the customer/user the various resources that were reconstructed bythe present technology (e.g., the rebuilt system resource definition andstate information) to assist with an off-line analysis and modificationas appropriate for a given implementation.

For purposes of the examples described herein, it should be noted,regarding state information/data for resources that is generated duringoperation of an information system, such as a CICS® system, that some ofthe state data is internal to the product. This state data is manageddirectly by the system. As such, the lifetime of the internal state datais not dependent upon external influences.

In contrast, other items of state data are externalized, either viacontrol blocks or via an application programming interface (API). Theseitems of state data may have a lifetime that is dependent upon the usersof the system, and may, in theory, persist indefinitely within the scopeof a given instance of the system, or perhaps even across restarts ofthe system by being reconstructed from some external recovery media suchas a system log or catalog data set.

Within the CICS® paradigm, an example of such a transient item of statedata is a temporary storage queue. A temporary storage queue may beexternalized via the CICS® API, and such queues may be written to (andmay be implicitly created if not already in existence), may be readfrom, may be rewritten, and may be deleted. These temporary storagequeues may be non-recoverable, and as such may be destroyed at the endof a CICS® system's run. Alternatively, temporary storage queues may berecoverable, and as such able to be reconstructed from the CICS® systemlog and rebuilt across restarts of the system. In this manner, temporarystorage queues may persist for potentially long periods of time. A CICS®system may create temporary storage queues by using attributes from a“TSMODEL” resource definition, which is a template for producingtemporary storage queues. Requests during operation are matched againstthe installed TSMODELs, and the TSMODEL with the best matchingcharacteristics for the queue name in question is used as the templatefor creating the requested queue. This means that different queues arepotentially created from different TSMODELs, depending upon the types ofattributes specified for the different TSMODELs.

Although temporary storage queues are a specific CICS® example oftransient state data, the same principle of extended lifetimes for suchresources may be found in other implementations within the technologyused to implement information systems, such as, for example, data heldwithin relational tables in a database, entries held in a hierarchicaldata management system, records on a data set, and message data queuedwithin a message queuing product, among other possible examples. Thesame principle of persistence applies to any such other examples ofresources with transient state data, and it is understood that thepresent technology applies to any such other examples, as appropriatefor a given implementation.

It should further be noted for purposes of the examples described hereinthat when an information system, such as CICS®, is shut down at the endof its run, one of the actions that the system performs is to record thecurrent state of the resources. This recording of the current state ofresources is different from committing their recovery data tosynchronize the data integrity of the system. Committing recovery datainvolves hardening the data to the CICS® system log, which is providedfor recovery purposes. For the purposes of resource state recording, theCICS® system writes the final state of its resources to a “catalog dataset.” This catalog data set is separate from the CSD data set. Thecatalog data set is read back when the CICS® system is “warm” restarted,so that the state of resources at the end of the previous run isrestored. The catalog data set provides a mechanism to restore thesystem state to the existing characteristics of the end of the previousrun, rather than when they were first installed into the system, becauseresources are not rebuilt from the CSD (as is done on cold restarts). Assuch, catalog data set processing provides for consistency between thestate of the rebuilt resources (reconstructed from the CICS® catalog)and the recoverable state of their data (as reconstructed from units ofwork (UOWs) and system key point data on the system log).

It should be noted that conception of the present subject matterresulted from recognition of certain limitations associated withinformation systems. For example, it was observed that when aninformation system, such as a customer information control system(CICS®), is started up “cold,” it creates initial entries (an initialstate) for its various system resources (e.g., files, terminals, queues,programs, documents, etc.). The initial entries are definitions createdfrom a system data set, known in a CICS® system as the CICS® SystemDefinition file (CSD), using an application programming interface (API).It was additionally observed that, while these initial states maypersist within the system address space as managed memory objects,certain operations (known as resource definition online (RDO)operations/data within a CICS® system) that occur while an informationsystem is online/active may change the content/state of these resourcesand may also update the CSD to reflect these changes after theinformation system is initialized. For example, it was observed thatprograms may be enabled or disabled, queues may be made recoverable ornon-recoverable, or files may be opened or closed. As these changes aremade to the resources, the information system updates the respectiveresource's state within the associated control blocks that represent theobjects held within memory for that runtime environment. It was furtherobserved that, when such an information system is shut down at the endof its run in an orderly manner, one of the actions that the systemperforms is to record the current state of these resources, which isdifferent from committing their recovery data, in order to synchronizethe data integrity of the system (the latter involves hardening the datato the CICS® system log, which is provided for recovery purposes). Forthe purposes of resource state recording, an information system such asCICS® writes the final state of its resources to a “catalog data set,”which is separate from the CSD data set. It was further observed thatthe catalog data set is read back in when the information system is“warm” restarted, so that the state of the resources at the end of theprevious run is restored rather than placing system resources in thestate at which they were first installed into the system. As such, itwas observed that such processing avoids having to rebuild resourcesfrom the CSD once more (as is done on cold restarts). However, in viewof these observations it was determined that, because the CSD and thecatalog data sets may be physically represented on a direct accessstorage device (DASD), there is the potential for a hardware failurethat corrupts or destroys the respective data sets, and a potential forsystem programmers or operators to inadvertently destroy or delete thecontent of the respective data sets. It was additionally determined thatbackups are not always available, or may themselves be subject tocorruption or deletion, and that disaster recovery procedures may not bein place to adequately manage such situations. In such situations, itwas determined that information system customers/users may experienceproblems with either the CSD data set or the catalog data set whichwould prevent a warm restart of the information system, and result in aloss of state information within their information system. For example,it was determined that, where the CSD is corrupted or non-existent,there is no way to restart the information system. Similarly, where thecatalog data set is corrupted or non-existent, a warm restart is notpossible and the only way to restart the information system is to startit cold from the initial state. The present subject matter improvesinformation system restarts by providing for reconstruction of systemdefinitional and state information, as described above and in moredetail below. As such, improved information system maintainability maybe obtained through the reconstruction of system definitional and stateinformation described herein.

The present subject matter improves information system resource statepreservation and fault-tolerant processing by implementing technology toreconstruct system definitional and state information. The presenttechnology operates in response to a determination that a CSD is lost,corrupted, or deleted, using the catalog data set used by the CICS®system in question to reconstruct the CSD. The catalog data set may beparsed, and resource information may be extracted from the catalog dataset. This extracted resource information may indicate the finalizedstate of the resources that had been cataloged when the CICS® systemlast ran and completed a warm shut down. Using this state data, theassociated resource definitions may be reconstructed on a new copy ofthe CSD. These reconstructed resource definitions would reflect thefinalized state of the resources, which may provide as close as possiblea match to the original states of the respective resources. The CSD maythen be made available to a restarted CICS® system. As such, acustomer/user may bring up an information system once more andsubsequently manage an orderly stabilization of the system undercircumstances where a restart may otherwise be impossible. Accordingly,the present technology allows a customer/user to be able to continue touse the information system environment for those resources that wouldotherwise be lost. Additionally, a diagnostic notification (e.g., amessage, warning, log, etc.) may be generated to document for thecustomer/user the various resources that were reconstructed in thismanner (e.g., the rebuilt system resource definition and stateinformation) to assist with any off-line analysis and modification asappropriate for a given implementation.

Similarly, the present technology operates in response to adetermination that a catalog data set is lost, corrupted, or deleted,using the CSD data set used by the CICS® system in question toreconstruct a useable catalog data set. The CSD data set may be parsed,and resource information may be extracted from the CSD data set. Thisextracted resource information may indicate the final resource state ofthe resources that had been available to the CICS® system when it lastran. Using this state data, the associated catalog records may bereconstructed on a new copy of the catalog data set. These reconstructedcatalog records would reflect the state of the resources, either intheir finalized form when last installed into the CICS® system from theCSD, or using their initial values when the CICS® system opened the CSDon the previous cold startup and built the resources from the CSD. Thisprocessing may provide as close a match to the original states forresources as may be achieved under such circumstances. The catalog dataset may then be available to a restarted CICS® system. As such, thecustomer/user may bring up an information system once more andsubsequently manage stabilization of the system under circumstanceswhere a restart may otherwise be impossible. Accordingly, the presenttechnology allows the customer/user to be able to continue to use theinformation system environment for those cataloged resources that wouldotherwise be lost. Again, as with reconstruction of the CSD, where acatalog data set is reconstructed, a diagnostic notification (e.g., amessage, warning, log, etc.) may be generated to warn the customer/userof the various resources that were reconstructed in this manner (e.g.,the rebuilt system resource definition and state information) to assistwith any off-line analysis and modification as appropriate for a givenimplementation.

It should be noted that an original CSD data set may have resourceswithin it that are not utilized by an individual information systeminstallation. As such, while reconstruction of a CSD from a singlecatalog data set for the particular system installation may yield a CSDuseable by that particular system installation, additional logic may beprovided for recovering a CSD from multiple catalog data sets acrossmultiple regions. By reconstructing the CSD from multiple catalog datasets across multiple regions, a more comprehensive reconstruction of theoriginal CSD may be performed. This may be used, for example, where aCSD is shared between multiple information system (e.g., CICS®) regions.

As such, when only a subset of the CSD definitions are installed on anyone CICS® region, the recovery technology described herein may operateto recover resources for a CSD that is under reconstruction frommultiple catalog data sets. This may be performed by iteration acrossthe multiple respective catalog data sets of interest for the respectiveregions to recreate RDO data for additional resources that are notrepresented within a single catalog data set as installed on any onesystem. The sum of the resource data from the multiple catalog data setsmay be utilized to reconstruct a more accurate CSD. For example, in sucha situation, the processing for reconstruction of a CSD may be able toobtain more information from multiple grouplists, where each grouplistis associated with a particular installation of the information system.Accordingly, the use of multiple grouplists to extract differentresources from different CICS® installations to reconstruct a CSD mayyield a more comprehensive CSD.

In situations where a definition that is installed on multipleinformation systems has different states/attributes (e.g., open/closedstate) in different regions, the logic may make a heuristic decisionbased upon the respective states in the multiple regions. For example,under such circumstances, states may be reset to a “lowest commondenominator” among the respective set of states represented in themultiple catalog data sets.

Additionally, the associated warnings/diagnostics pertinent to suchprocessing across multiple regions may document the respective decisionsmade during the automated reconstruction of system definitional andstate information performed across the multiple catalog data sets. Otherapproaches to resolution of state differences across multiple regionsare possible and all are considered to be within the scope of thepresent subject matter.

It should additionally be noted with respect to reconstruction of acatalog data set that the state of a particular resource may beinferred. For example, definitions of default resource run-time statevalues and value selection decisions for system resources may beestablished, and these definitions may be used to enhance resource statedecision making during reconstruction of a catalog data set to accountfor typical installation state variations and to more accuratelyapproximate the state of the respective resource in the lost catalogdata set that is under reconstruction. As such, a more accuratereconstruction of a catalog data set may be performed by intelligentdecision making with respect to state selection during catalog data setreconstruction.

The reconstruction of system definitional and state informationdescribed herein may be performed in real time to allow promptreconstruction of definitional and/or state information for informationsystems. For purposes of the present description, real time shallinclude any time frame of sufficiently short duration as to providereasonable response time for information processing acceptable to a userof the subject matter described. Additionally, the term “real time”shall include what is commonly termed “near real time”—generally meaningany time frame of sufficiently short duration as to provide reasonableresponse time for on-demand information processing acceptable to a userof the subject matter described (e.g., within a portion of a second orwithin a few seconds). These terms, while difficult to precisely defineare well understood by those skilled in the art.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example of an implementation of a system100 for reconstruction of system definitional and state information. Acomputing device_1 102 through a computing device_N 104 communicate viaa network 106 with a server 108. For purposes of the present examples,the computing device_1 102 through the computing device_N 104 may beconsidered client-type devices, while the server 108 may be consideredeither an application server or a transaction processing server.However, any other server appropriate for a given implementation may beused.

Any of the computing device_1 102 through the computing device_N 104and/or the server 108 may provide reconstruction of system definitionaland state information. As such and as will be described in more detailbelow in association with FIG. 2 through FIG. 4B, Any of the computingdevice_1 102 through the computing device_N 104 and/or the server 108may provide automated reconstruction of system definitional and stateinformation. The automated reconstruction of system definitional andstate information is based upon utilization of one or more availablecatalog data sets to reconstruct a CSD and/or utilization of a CSD toreconstruct one or more catalog data sets. As such, a variety ofpossibilities exist for implementation of the present subject matter,and all such possibilities are considered within the scope of thepresent subject matter.

It should be noted that any of the respective computing devicesdescribed in association with FIG. 1 may be portable computing devices,either by a user's ability to move the respective computing devices todifferent locations, or by the respective computing device's associationwith a portable platform, such as a plane, train, automobile, or othermoving vehicle. It should also be noted that the respective computingdevices may be any computing devices capable of processing informationas described above and in more detail below. For example, the respectivecomputing devices may include devices such as a personal computer (e.g.,desktop, laptop, etc.) or a handheld device (e.g., cellular telephone,smartphone, personal digital assistant (PDA), email device, musicrecording or playback device, tablet computing device, e-book readingdevice, etc.), a web server, application server, or other data serverdevice, or any other device capable of processing information asdescribed above and in more detail below.

The network 106 may include any form of interconnection suitable for theintended purpose, including a private or public network such as anintranet or the Internet, respectively, direct inter-moduleinterconnection, dial-up, wireless, or any other interconnectionmechanism capable of interconnecting the respective devices.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example of an implementation of a coreprocessing module 200 capable of performing reconstruction of systemdefinitional and state information. The core processing module 200 maybe associated with either the computing device_1 102 through thecomputing device_N 104 or with the server 108, as appropriate for agiven implementation. As such, the core processing module 200 isdescribed generally herein, though it is understood that many variationson implementation of the components within the core processing module200 are possible and all such variations are within the scope of thepresent subject matter.

Further, the core processing module 200 may provide different andcomplementary processing for reconstruction of system definitional andstate information in association with each implementation. As such, forany of the examples below, it is understood that any aspect offunctionality described with respect to any one device that is describedin conjunction with another device (e.g., sends/sending, etc.) is to beunderstood to concurrently describe the functionality of the otherrespective device (e.g., receives/receiving, etc.).

A central processing unit (CPU) 202 provides computer instructionexecution, computation, and other capabilities within the coreprocessing module 200. A display 204 provides visual information to auser of the core processing module 200 and an input device 206 providesinput capabilities for the user.

The display 204 may include any display device, such as a cathode raytube (CRT), liquid crystal display (LCD), light emitting diode (LED),electronic ink displays, projection, touchscreen, or other displayelement or panel. The input device 206 may include a computer keyboard,a keypad, a mouse, a pen, a joystick, touchscreen, or any other type ofinput device by which the user may interact with and respond toinformation on the display 204.

It should be noted that the display 204 and the input device 206 areillustrated with a dashed-line representation within FIG. 2 to indicatethat they may be optional components for the core processing module 200for certain implementations/devices. Accordingly, the core processingmodule 200 may operate as a completely automated embedded device withoutdirect user configurability or feedback. However, the core processingmodule 200 may also provide user feedback and configurability via thedisplay 204 and the input device 206, respectively, as appropriate for agiven implementation.

A communication module 208 provides interconnection capabilities thatallow the core processing module 200 to communicate with other moduleswithin the system 100. The communication module 208 may include anyelectrical, protocol, and protocol conversion capabilities useable toprovide interconnection capabilities, as appropriate for a givenimplementation.

A memory 210 represents storage for application information, data, andother information for the core processing module 200. The memory 210includes a customer information control system (CICS®) application area212 that stores and executes a CICS® application for implementations ofthe server 108 that include transaction processing capabilities. TheCICS® application area 212 is shown in a dashed-line representation toshow that this area may exist for those implementations of the coreprocessing module 200 that include transaction processing capabilities,such as at the server 108 when implemented as a transaction server.

The memory 210 also includes a system information storage area 214 thatstores system information, such as one or more CSD data sets and one ormore catalog data sets for use during runtime of the CICS® application.The system information stored within the system information storage area214 may also be used, as described above and in more detail below,during reconstruction of system definitional and state informationactivities within core processing module 200. For example, defaultresource run-time state values and value selection decisions for systemresources may be defined within the system information storage area 214,and this information may be used to infer state values for resourcesduring reconstruction of catalog data sets and/or CSDs.

It is understood that the memory 210 may include any combination ofvolatile and non-volatile memory suitable for the intended purpose,distributed or localized as appropriate, and may include other memorysegments not illustrated within the present example for ease ofillustration purposes. For example, the memory 210 may include a codestorage area, an operating system storage area, a code execution area,and a data area without departure from the scope of the present subjectmatter.

A system information reconstruction module 216 is also illustrated. Thesystem information reconstruction module 216 provides analytical dataprocessing capabilities within the core processing module 200, asdescribed above and in more detail below. The system informationreconstruction module 216 implements the automated reconstruction ofsystem definitional and state information of the core processing module200.

The system information reconstruction module 216 includes severalcomponents/modules that facilitate the processing performed by thesystem information reconstruction module 216. A parser module 218 readsthe respective CSD or catalog data set, and extracts the appropriaterecords from the respective data set relating to the system resourcesand their initial or finalized states, respectively. A rebuilder module220 defines a new instance of the respective lost, corrupted, or damageddata set(s). A reconstructor module 222 reconstructs the content of therespective lost, corrupted, or damaged data set(s) from the informationextracted from the respective other of the CSD or catalog data set usedto rebuild the respective catalog data set or CSD. A consistency checkermodule 224 ensures that the rebuilt data on the respective new data setreflects the environment as represented by the respective other of theCSD or catalog data set used to rebuild the respective catalog data setor CSD. A diagnostic module 226 generates diagnostics (e.g., anotification, log, etc.) to reflect what resources (e.g., the rebuiltsystem resource definition and state information) were affected by thereconstruction of the respective data set(s).

It should also be noted that the system information reconstructionmodule 216 may form a portion of other circuitry described withoutdeparture from the scope of the present subject matter. Further, thesystem information reconstruction module 216 may alternatively beimplemented as an application stored within the memory 210. In such animplementation, the system information reconstruction module 216 mayinclude instructions executed by the CPU 202 for performing thefunctionality described herein. The CPU 202 may execute theseinstructions to provide the processing capabilities described above andin more detail below for the core processing module 200. The systeminformation reconstruction module 216 may form a portion of an interruptservice routine (ISR), a portion of an operating system, a portion of abrowser application, or a portion of a separate application withoutdeparture from the scope of the present subject matter.

The CPU 202, the display 204, the input device 206, the communicationmodule 208, the memory 210, and the system information reconstructionmodule 216 are interconnected via an interconnection 228. Theinterconnection 228 may include a system bus, a network, or any otherinterconnection capable of providing the respective components withsuitable interconnection for the respective purpose.

Though the different modules illustrated within FIG. 2 are illustratedas component-level modules for ease of illustration and descriptionpurposes, it should be noted that these modules may include anyhardware, programmed processor(s), and memory used to carry out thefunctions of the respective modules as described above and in moredetail below. For example, the modules may include additional controllercircuitry in the form of application specific integrated circuits(ASICs), processors, antennas, and/or discrete integrated circuits andcomponents for performing communication and electrical controlactivities associated with the respective modules. Additionally, themodules may include interrupt-level, stack-level, and application-levelmodules as appropriate. Furthermore, the modules may include any memorycomponents used for storage, execution, and data processing forperforming processing activities associated with the respective modules.The modules may also form a portion of other circuitry described or maybe combined without departure from the scope of the present subjectmatter.

Additionally, while the core processing module 200 is illustrated withand has certain components described, other modules and components maybe associated with the core processing module 200 without departure fromthe scope of the present subject matter. Additionally, it should benoted that, while the core processing module 200 is described as asingle device for ease of illustration purposes, the components withinthe core processing module 200 may be co-located or distributed andinterconnected via a network without departure from the scope of thepresent subject matter. For a distributed arrangement, the display 204and the input device 206 may be located at a point of sale device,kiosk, or other location, while the CPU 202 and memory 210 may belocated at a local or remote server. Many other possible arrangementsfor components of the core processing module 200 are possible and allare considered within the scope of the present subject matter.Accordingly, the core processing module 200 may take many forms and maybe associated with many platforms.

FIG. 3 through FIG. 4B described below represent example processes thatmay be executed by devices, such as the core processing module 200, toperform the reconstruction of system definitional and state informationassociated with the present subject matter. Many other variations on theexample processes are possible and all are considered within the scopeof the present subject matter. The example processes may be performed bymodules, such as the system information reconstruction module 216 and/orexecuted by the CPU 202, associated with such devices. It should benoted that time out procedures and other error control procedures arenot illustrated within the example processes described below for ease ofillustration purposes. However, it is understood that all suchprocedures are considered to be within the scope of the present subjectmatter. Further, the described processes may be combined, sequences ofthe processing described may be changed, and additional processing maybe added or removed without departure from the scope of the presentsubject matter.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart of an example of an implementation of a process300 for reconstruction of system definitional and state information. Atblock 302, the process 300 determines, via a processor, that one of asystem definition file data set and a catalog data set used by aninformation system is unavailable for orderly restart of the informationsystem, where the system definition file data set provides resourcedefinition information and the catalog data set provides resource stateinformation for the information system. At block 304, the process 300determines that the other of the system definition file data set and thecatalog data set is available. At block 306, the process 300reconstructs the unavailable one of the system definition file data setand the catalog data set by rebuilding the system resource definitionand state information used by the unavailable one of the systemdefinition file data set and the catalog data set using system resourceinformation within the other available one of the system definition filedata set and the catalog data set.

FIGS. 4A-4B illustrate a flow chart of an example of an implementationof a process 400 for automated reconstruction of system definitional andstate information. FIG. 4A illustrates initial processing within theprocess 400. At decision point 402, the process 400 makes adetermination as to whether a restart of an information system ispending. For example, in error or failure associated with an informationsystem may be detected or a user request to restart the informationsystem may be detected. In response to determining that a restart of theinformation system is pending, the process 400 makes a determination atdecision point 404 as to whether both the catalog data set and a systemdefinition file data set are available. As described above, where boththe catalog data set and the system definition file data set areavailable, the information system may be started normally from a stateof the last warm restart, as represented within the catalog data set. Assuch, in response to determining that both the catalog data set and asystem definition file data set are available, the process 400 utilizesthe respective resource files to restart information system at block406.

Returning to decision point 404, it should be noted that unavailabilityof either of the catalog data set or the system definition file data setmay be due to corruption of the respective data set, deletion of therespective data set, or other causes for unavailability of therespective data set. In response to determining at decision point 404that both of the catalog data set and the system definition file dataset are not available, the process 400 makes a determination at decisionpoint 408 as to whether either of the catalog data set or the systemdefinition file data set is available. As such, the process 400 makes adetermination as to whether at least one uncorrupted data set isavailable from which to attempt to reconstruct the other unavailabledata set. In response to determining that neither data set is available,process 400 generates an error notification at block 410, and returns todecision point 402 and iterates as described above.

Returning to the description of decision point 408, in response todetermining that either data set is available, the process 400 makes adetermination at decision point 412 as to whether it is the catalog dataset that is available (and contemporaneously whether it is the systemdefinition file data set that is available). As such, in response todetermining that the catalog data set is the available data set, theprocess 400 defines a new instance of the system definition file dataset, such as a new instance of a CSD, at block 414. At block 416, theprocess 400 parses the available catalog data set. At block 418, theprocess 400 extracts records related to resource definition and stateinformation from the parsed catalog data set.

At decision point 420, the process 400 makes a determination as towhether any additional catalog data sets are available for processing.For example, as described above, where a CSD is shared among multipleinformation system installations, each individual installation of theinformation system may not have all available system resourcesinstalled. However, the set of information system installations may havea set of installed resources that more closely approximates theavailable system resources within the original CSD. As such, by usingmultiple catalog data sets for reconstruction of a CSD, there is ahigher probability of identifying more resource information than where asingle catalog data set is used. Accordingly, a more-comprehensive CSDmay be reconstructed by using multiple catalog data sets.

In response to determining at decision point 420 that additional catalogdata sets are available for processing, the process 400 returns to block416 to parse an additional catalog data set and iterates as describedabove until all available catalog data sets have been parsed and allsuitable records have been extracted for reconstruction of a systemdefinition file data set. In response to determining at decision point420 that no additional catalog data sets are available for processing,the process 400 reconstructs the content of the unavailable systemdefinition file data set within the new instance of the systemdefinition file data set using the extracted records related to resourcedefinition and state information extracted from one or more parsedcatalog data sets at block 422.

At block 424, the process 400 performs a consistency check on thereconstructed system definition file data set to ensure compliance ofthe rebuilt system resource definition and state information for properrestart of the information system. For example, the determination ofconsistency of the system resource definition and state information maybe based upon resource names, length of control blocks, items of statevalues set to consistent or default values, or other consistencymeasures as appropriate for a given implementation.

At decision point 426, the process 400 makes a determination as towhether a consistency check indicates that the system resourcedefinition and state information is consistent. In response todetermining that the system resource definition and state information isnot consistent, the process 400 returns to block 410 to generate anerror notification and iterates as described above. In response todetermining that the system resource definition and state information isconsistent, the process 400 restarts the information system utilizingthe reconstructed system definition file data set and the catalog dataset of the installed information system at block 428. At block 430, theprocess 400 generates a diagnostic notification that documents therebuilt system resource definition and state information associated withthe reconstructed system definition file data set. As described above,the diagnostic notification may be utilized by a customer/user toevaluate the restart of the system such that an orderly shut down orother action may be performed as appropriate for a given implementation.The process 400 returns to decision point 402 and iterates as describedabove.

Returning to the description of decision point 412, in response todetermining that the catalog data set is not available and that thesystem definition file data set is available, the process 400transitions to the processing shown and described in association withFIG. 4B.

FIG. 4B illustrates additional processing associated with the process300 for automated reconstruction of system definitional and stateinformation. At block 432, the process 400 parses the system definitionfile data set. At block 434, the process 400 extracts records related tothe resource definition and state information from the parsed systemdefinition file data set. At block 436, the process 400 defines a newinstance of the catalog data set.

At decision point 438, the process 400 makes a determination as towhether to infer a state for resources within the catalog data set to bereconstructed. For example, as discussed above, because the catalog dataset represents resource states for installed resources at the end of thelast warm restart of the information system, inferring a state for oneor more installed resources may be performed to select the defaultoperational state for use during a subsequent restart using thereconstructed catalog data set.

In response to determining to infer a state for at least one systemresource, the process 400 accesses information that defines defaultresource run-time state values and value selection decisions for systemresources at block 440. At block 442, the process 400 infers stateinformation for at least one system resource based upon the accessedinformation that defines default resource run-time state values andvalue selection decisions for system resources.

In response to inferring the state values for one or more systemresources at block 442, or in response to determining at decision point438 not to infer a state for any system resources, the process 400reconstructs the catalog data set by rebuilding system resourcedefinition and state information used by the catalog data set at block444. At block 446, the process 400 performs a consistency check on thereconstructed catalog data set to ensure compliance of the rebuiltsystem resource definition and state information for proper restart ofthe information system. For example, the determination of consistency ofthe system resource definition and state information may be based uponresource names, length of control blocks, items of state values set toconsistent or default values, or other consistency measures asappropriate for a given implementation.

At decision point 448, the process 400 makes a determination as towhether the consistency check indicates that the system resourcedefinition and state information is consistent. In response todetermining that the system resource definition and state information isnot consistent, the process 400 generates an error notification at block450, and returns to processing described in association with FIG. 4A atdecision point 402 and iterates as described above. In response todetermining that the system resource definition and state information isconsistent, the process 400 restarts the information system utilizingthe system definition file data set and reconstructed catalog data setat block 452. At block 454, the process 400 generates a diagnosticnotification that documents the rebuilt system resource definition andstate information associated with the reconstructed catalog data set. Asdescribed above, the diagnostic notification may be utilized by acustomer/user to evaluate the restart of the system such that an orderlyshut down or other action may be performed as appropriate for a givenimplementation. The process 400 returns to the processing described inassociation with FIG. 4A at decision point 402 and iterates as describedabove.

As such, the process 400 performs automated processing to determinewhether either of a catalog data set or a system definition file dataset is unavailable for use in association with an information systemrestart. In response to determining that either data set is unavailableand that one of the respective data sets is available, the process 400reconstructs the respective other data set from the available data set.Accordingly, the process 400 provides for an orderly restart of aninformation system that has a missing or corrupted data set, where itmay not otherwise be able to be restarted. Further, the process 400provides diagnostics that allow a customer/user to evaluate systemissues and perform an orderly shut down of the system, as appropriatefor a given implementation.

As described above in association with FIG. 1 through FIG. 4B, theexample systems and processes provide reconstruction of systemdefinitional and state information. Many other variations and additionalactivities associated with reconstruction of system definitional andstate information are possible and all are considered within the scopeof the present subject matter.

Those skilled in the art will recognize, upon consideration of the aboveteachings, that certain of the above examples are based upon use of aprogrammed processor, such as the CPU 202. However, the invention is notlimited to such example embodiments, since other embodiments could beimplemented using hardware component equivalents such as special purposehardware and/or dedicated processors. Similarly, general purposecomputers, microprocessor based computers, micro-controllers, opticalcomputers, analog computers, dedicated processors, application specificcircuits and/or dedicated hard wired logic may be used to constructalternative equivalent embodiments.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the presentinvention may be embodied as a system, method or computer programproduct. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the formof an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment(including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or anembodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may allgenerally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.”Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of acomputer program product embodied in one or more computer readablemedium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.

Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may beutilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signalmedium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readablestorage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic,magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system,apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. Morespecific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readablestorage medium would include the following: an electrical connectionhaving one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, arandom access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasableprogrammable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, amagnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium maybe any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use byor in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, ordevice.

A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signalwith computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, inbaseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may takeany of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to,electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. Acomputer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium thatis not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate,propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with aninstruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmittedusing any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless,wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination ofthe foregoing.

Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of thepresent invention may be written in any combination of one or moreprogramming languages, including an object oriented programming languagesuch as JAVA™, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional proceduralprogramming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similarprogramming languages. The program code may execute entirely on theuser's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alonesoftware package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remotecomputer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latterscenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computerthrough any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or awide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an externalcomputer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet ServiceProvider).

Aspects of the present invention have been described with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer program instructions. These computer program instructions maybe provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, specialpurpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus toproduce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via theprocessor of the computer or other programmable data processingapparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified inthe flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in acomputer-readable storage medium that can direct a computer or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to function in a particularmanner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readablestorage medium produce an article of manufacture including instructionswhich implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks.

The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer,other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to causea series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, otherprogrammable apparatus or other devices to produce a computerimplemented process such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer or other programmable apparatus provide processes forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof code, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be notedthat, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in theblock may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, twoblocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantiallyconcurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverseorder, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be notedthat each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, andcombinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchartillustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-basedsystems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations ofspecial purpose hardware and computer instructions.

A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing programcode will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectlyto memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can includelocal memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulkstorage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at leastsome program code in order to reduce the number of times code must beretrieved from bulk storage during execution.

Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards,displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system eitherdirectly or through intervening I/O controllers.

Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the dataprocessing system to become coupled to other data processing systems orremote printers or storage devices through intervening private or publicnetworks. Modems, cable modems and Ethernet cards are just a few of thecurrently available types of network adapters.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particularembodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. Asused herein, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended toinclude the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicatesotherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises”and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify thepresence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements,and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of oneor more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements,components, and/or groups thereof.

The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of allmeans or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended toinclude any structure, material, or act for performing the function incombination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. Thedescription of the present invention has been presented for purposes ofillustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive orlimited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications andvariations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the artwithout departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Theembodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain theprinciples of the invention and the practical application, and to enableothers of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention forvarious embodiments with various modifications as are suited to theparticular use contemplated.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system, comprising: a memory; and a processorprogrammed to: determine that one of a system definition file data setand a catalog data set is unavailable for orderly restart of aninformation system, where the system definition file data set providessystem resource definition information and the catalog data set providessystem resource state information for the information system; determinethat the other of the system definition file data set and the catalogdata set is available; and reconstruct within the memory the unavailableone of the system definition file data set and the catalog data set byrebuilding the system resource definition and state information used bythe unavailable one of the system definition file data set and thecatalog data set using system resource information within the otheravailable one of the system definition file data set and the catalogdata set, comprising the processor being programmed to: reconstruct thesystem definition file data set in response to determining that thecatalog data set is available, comprising: parsing the catalog data set;extracting records related to the system resource definition and stateinformation from the parsed catalog data set; defining a new instance ofthe system definition file data set; and reconstructing the content ofthe unavailable system definition file data set within the new instanceof the system definition file data set using the records related to thesystem resource definition and state information extracted from theparsed catalog data set.
 2. The system of claim 1, where the systemresource definition information comprises resource definitions withinitial resource states and the system resource state informationcomprises state changes of resources from the initial resource states,and where the processor is further programmed to restart the informationsystem utilizing the reconstructed one of the system definition filedata set and the catalog data set.
 3. The system of claim 1, where theprocessor is further programmed to perform a consistency check on thereconstructed one of the system definition file data set and the catalogdata set to ensure compliance of the rebuilt system resource definitionand state information for proper restart of the information system. 4.The system of claim 1, where the processor is further programmed togenerate a diagnostic notification that documents the rebuilt systemresource definition and state information.
 5. The system of claim 1,where the system definition file data set is used by a plurality ofinstallations of the information system and where, in being programmedto reconstruct the system definition file data set in response todetermining that the catalog data set is available, the processor isprogrammed to: reconstruct the system definition file data set inresponse to determining that a plurality of catalog data sets from otherof the plurality of installations of the information system areavailable, and where: parsing the catalog data set comprises parsingeach of the plurality of catalog data sets; extracting the recordsrelated to the system resource definition and state information from theparsed catalog data set comprises extracting records related to thesystem resource definition and state information from each of the parsedplurality of catalog data sets; and reconstructing the content of theunavailable system definition file data set within the new instance ofthe system definition file data set using the records related to thesystem resource definition and state information extracted from theparsed catalog data set comprises reconstructing the content of theunavailable system definition file data set within the new instance ofthe system definition file data set using the records related to thesystem resource definition and state information extracted from theplurality of parsed catalog data sets.
 6. A computer program product,comprising: a computer readable storage memory having computer readableprogram code embodied therewith, where the computer readable programcode when executed on a computer causes the computer to: determine thatone of a system definition file data set and a catalog data set isunavailable for orderly restart of an information system, where thesystem definition file data set provides system resource definitioninformation and the catalog data set provides system resource stateinformation for the information system; determine that the other of thesystem definition file data set and the catalog data set is available;and reconstruct the unavailable one of the system definition file dataset and the catalog data set by rebuilding the system resourcedefinition and state information used by the unavailable one of thesystem definition file data set and the catalog data set using systemresource information within the other available one of the systemdefinition file data set and the catalog data set, where the computerreadable program code when executed on the computer causes the computerto: reconstruct the system definition file data set in response todetermining that the catalog data set is available, comprising: parsingthe catalog data set; extracting records related to the system resourcedefinition and state information from the parsed catalog data set;defining a new instance of the system definition file data set; andreconstructing the content of the unavailable system definition filedata set within the new instance of the system definition file data setusing the records related to the system resource definition and stateinformation extracted from the parsed catalog data set.
 7. The computerprogram product of claim 6, where the system resource definitioninformation comprises resource definitions with initial resource statesand the system resource state information comprises state changes ofresources from the initial resource states, and where the computerreadable program code when executed on the computer further causes thecomputer to restart the information system utilizing the reconstructedone of the system definition file data set and the catalog data set. 8.The computer program product of claim 6, where the computer readableprogram code when executed on the computer further causes the computerto perform a consistency check on the reconstructed one of the systemdefinition file data set and the catalog data set to ensure complianceof the rebuilt system resource definition and state information forproper restart of the information system.
 9. The computer programproduct of claim 6, where the computer readable program code whenexecuted on the computer further causes the computer to generate adiagnostic notification that documents the rebuilt system resourcedefinition and state information.
 10. The computer program product ofclaim 6, where the system definition file data set is used by aplurality of installations of the information system and where, incausing the computer to reconstruct the system definition file data setin response to determining that the catalog data set is available, thecomputer readable program code when executed on the computer causes thecomputer to: reconstruct the system definition file data set in responseto determining that a plurality of catalog data sets from other of theplurality of installations of the information system are available, andwhere: parsing the catalog data set comprises parsing each of theplurality of catalog data sets; extracting the records related to thesystem resource definition and state information from the parsed catalogdata set comprises extracting records related to the system resourcedefinition and state information from each of the parsed plurality ofcatalog data sets; and reconstructing the content of the unavailablesystem definition file data set within the new instance of the systemdefinition file data set using the records related to the systemresource definition and state information extracted from the parsedcatalog data set comprises reconstructing the content of the unavailablesystem definition file data set within the new instance of the systemdefinition file data set using the records related to the systemresource definition and state information extracted from the pluralityof parsed catalog data sets.
 11. A computer program product, comprising:a computer readable storage memory having computer readable program codeembodied therewith, where the computer readable program code whenexecuted on a computer causes the computer to: determine that one of asystem definition file data set and a catalog data set is unavailablefor orderly restart of an information system, where the systemdefinition file data set provides system resource definition informationand the catalog data set provides system resource state information forthe information system; determine that the other of the systemdefinition file data set and the catalog data set is available; andreconstruct the unavailable one of the system definition file data setand the catalog data set by rebuilding the system resource definitionand state information used by the unavailable one of the systemdefinition file data set and the catalog data set using system resourceinformation within the other available one of the system definition filedata set and the catalog data set, where the computer readable programcode when executed on the computer causes the computer to: reconstructthe catalog data set in response to determining that the systemdefinition file data set is available, comprising: parsing the systemdefinition file data set; extracting records related to the systemresource definition and state information from the parsed systemdefinition file data set; defining a new instance of the catalog dataset; and reconstructing the content of the unavailable catalog data setwithin the new instance of the catalog data set using the recordsrelated to the system resource definition and state informationextracted from the parsed system definition file data set.
 12. Thecomputer program product of claim 11, where, in causing the computer toreconstruct the content of the unavailable catalog data set within thenew instance of the catalog data set using the records related to thesystem resource definition and state information extracted from theparsed system definition file data set, the computer readable programcode when executed on the computer causes the computer to: accessinformation that defines default system resource run-time state valuesand value selection decisions for system resources; and infer stateinformation for at least one system resource based upon the accessedinformation that defines the default system resource run-time statevalues and value selection decisions for the system resources.
 13. Thecomputer program product of claim 11, where the computer program productis in the form of a computer system, with the computer program productfurther comprising: a processor(s) set structured, programmed, and/orconnected to execute the computer readable program code stored in thecomputer readable storage memory.
 14. The computer program product ofclaim 12, where the computer program product is in the form of acomputer system, with the computer program product further comprising: aprocessor(s) set is structured, programmed, and/or connected to executethe computer readable program code stored in the computer readablestorage memory.